When Sanae Takaichi won the LDP leadership in October 2025, Japan stood at the edge of history: its first female prime minister was about to take office. Global markets applauded, the yen stabilized, and investors saw continuity with the proâgrowth, securityâminded policies of Shinzo Abe. Yet, at home, the reaction was icy. The same media that had long demanded a âfemale leaderâ suddenly discovered reasons to dislike oneâbecause she was conservative.
In a twist of irony, Japanâs selfâproclaimed âliberalâ elites, joined by progressive pundits and opposition figures, began doing what they had accused conservatives of for decades: bullying a woman for her beliefs.
đThe Irony of Inclusion
For years, mainstream outlets like NHK and Asahi Shimbun lamented the absence of women in Japanâs power structure. But once a woman finally roseâone who championed traditional values and national defenseâthey turned skeptical. The coverage shifted from âhistoric breakthroughâ to âdangerous nationalism.â
Takaichi wasnât criticized for incompetence; she was targeted for conviction. The message was clear: a woman is welcome in power, but only if she repeats the liberal script. Japanâs political glass ceiling, it turns out, has an ideological lock.
đşThe Mediaâs Double Standard
Television talk shows replayed her speeches with mocking commentary. Her patriotism was called âprovocative,â her loyalty to Abe âproblematic.â Meanwhile, male politicians espousing similar policies were described as âexperiencedâ or âprincipled.â
When a conservative woman speaks firmly, sheâs labeled âaggressive.â When a liberal man defends the same policy, heâs called ârational.â The hypocrisy was visible, audible, measurable. Japanâs press, once proud of balance, now behaves like a gatekeeper of acceptable ideology.
đď¸The Political Pushback
Within days of her victory, Komeito withdrew from its 26âyear coalition with the LDP, citing âpolicy differences.â But insiders knew the real reason: discomfort with her unapologetically conservative worldviewâon defense, energy, and education.
What the media framed as âpolicy misalignmentâ was, in reality, ideological discrimination. A woman prime minister who defends her countryâs traditions threatened both the oppositionâs narrative and the mediaâs monopoly on moral virtue.
đThe Global Contrast
Abroad, Takaichi was compared to Margaret Thatcherâtough, strategic, and consistent. International investors praised her for fiscal realism and continuity. The contrast was striking: foreign markets trusted her judgment more than her own countryâs media did.
The episode exposed Japanâs political paradoxâits economy is globalized, but its public discourse remains provincial. The rest of the world has moved on from ColdâWar binaries; Japanâs commentariat has not.
âď¸The Feminism That Isnât
Ironically, those who claim to fight for gender equality became the most active in undermining a woman who didnât share their ideology. Feminist commentators stayed silent as tabloids dissected her appearance and tone. Progressive politicians, eager for social approval, joined the pileâon.
Real feminism means defending a womanâs right to think freelyânot forcing her to conform. In this sense, Takaichiâs struggle isnât just political; itâs existential. Sheâs fighting for the right of women to be conservative without being condemned.
đžLessons for Japanâs Democracy
The episode has laid bare Japanâs deeper illness: a democracy that tolerates women in power only when they are harmless. A system that applauds representation but punishes conviction.
Japan doesnât need more symbolic firstsâit needs the courage to let leaders lead, regardless of gender or ideology. Until that happens, its democracy will remain an echo chamber where âdiversityâ means sameness.
đConclusion
The markets cheered because they saw stability. The media feared because they saw change. That irony says everything about Japanâs current crossroads: a country where the global economy is more openâminded than its political class.
In the end, Sanae Takaichi may not just be Japanâs first female prime ministerâshe may be its first truly independent one. And that, for the soâcalled liberals, is whatâs truly terrifying.